Analysis of nitrogen controls on carbon and water exchanges in a conifer forest using the CLASS-CTEMN+ model

Suo Huang, M. Altaf Arain, Vivek K. Arora, Fengming Yuan, Jason Brodeur, Matthias Peichl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

A carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycle-coupled model, CLASS-CTEMN+ was developed by incorporating soil and plant N cycling algorithms in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM), used in the Canadian Global Climate Model. Key soil and plant N cycling processes incorporated in the model include biological fixation, mineralization, nitrification, denitrification, leaching and N controls on plant photosynthesis capacity. The model was used to analyse N controls on C and water exchanges in a 70-year-old temperate conifer forest in southern Ontario, Canada from 2003 to 2007. The simulated values of soil-plant N contents and fluxes - including N2O flux - were generally in good agreement with observations. When N controls on C and water cycling were included in the model, simulated daily gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (Re), net ecosystem productivity (NEP) and evapotranspiration (ET) fluxes showed improved agreement with eddy covariance flux measurements. The five-year mean annual NEP predicted by the N-coupled model was 121gCm-2yr- for 2003-2007, compared to 273gCm-2yr-1, which was simulated by the model when N controls were switched off (non-N model). N-coupled model estimates compared well with the measured five-year mean (± standard deviation) annual NEP of 136±59gCm-2yr-1. Simulated annual mean ET over five-years was 384mmyr-1 for the N-coupled model, and 433mmyr-1 for non-N model, compared with the measured five-year mean annual value of 405±44mmyr-1. Model results confirmed that a proper representation of N controls on photosynthetic uptake and canopy conductance could result in more plausible simulations of observed C and water fluxes. The model results also suggested that N limitations in spring and early summer were generally more important in controlling NEP. Discrepancies between simulated and measured annual variations of C exchanges occurred in years that included extreme weather periods (e.g. low soil water content and warm spring/summer temperatures).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3743-3760
Number of pages18
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume222
Issue number20-22
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery and Strategic grants . The Turkey Point project also received funding from the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) , Canadian Foundation of Innovation (CFI) , Ontario Innovation Trust (OIT) , and the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS) -funded Canadian Carbon Program (CCP). In-kind support from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) , Ministry of Natural Resources-Canadian Forest Service (MNR-CFS) , Environment Canada, Long Point Conservation Authority (LPRCA) , Norfolk County and McMaster University is acknowledged. We thank Andy Black and Zoran Nesic at the University of British Columbia for their help and advice in flux measurements and Diana Verseghy and Paul Bartlett at the Environment Canada for their help and advice for CLASS model. We also acknowledge contributions made by the Environment Canada's, Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCMa) in the development of CTEM model. We thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Keywords

  • Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS)
  • Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM)
  • Carbon and water fluxes
  • Nitrogen-Carbon-coupling
  • Temperate forest

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of nitrogen controls on carbon and water exchanges in a conifer forest using the CLASS-CTEMN+ model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this