Alternatives to nitric acid stripping in the caustic-side solvent extraction (CSSX) process for cesium removal from alkaline high-level waste

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Effective alternatives to nitric acid stripping in the Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) solvent have been demonstrated in this work. The CSSX solvent employs calix[4]arene-bis(tert-octylbenzo-18-crown-6) (BOBCalixC6) as the cesium extractant in a modified alkane diluent for decontamination of alkaline high-level wastes, such as those found at the Savannah River and Hanford sites. Results reported in this paper support the idea that replacement of the nitrate anion by a much more hydrophilic anion like borate can substantially lower cesium distribution ratios on stripping. Without any other change in the CSSX flowsheet, however, the use of a boric acid stripping solution in place of the 1 mM nitric acid solution used in the CSSX process marginally, though perhaps still usefully, improves stripping. The less-than-expected improvement was explained by the carryover of nitrate from scrubbing into stripping. Accordingly, more effective stripping is obtained after a scrub of the solvent with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide. Functional alternatives to boric acid include sodium bicarbonate or cesium hydroxide as strip solutions. Profound stripping improvement is achieved when trioctylamine, one of the components of the CSSX solvent, is replaced with a commercial guanidine reagent (LIX® 79). The more basic guanidine affords greater latitude in the selection of aqueous conditions in that it becomes protonated even at mildly alkaline pH values. Under process-relevant conditions, cesium distribution ratios on stripping are approximately 100-fold lower compared with the current CSSX performance. The tolerance to surfactants is good, and the extraction properties of the solvent remain unchanged over three successive extract-scrub-strip cycles. From the point of view of compatibility with downstream processing, boric acid represents an attractive stripping agent, as it is also a potentially ideal feed for borosilicate vitrification of the separated 137Cs product stream. The possibilities for use of these results toward a dramatically better next-generation CSSX process, possibly one employing the more soluble cesium extractant calix[4]arene-bis(2-ethylhexylbenzo-18-crown-6) (BEHBCalixC6) are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-198
Number of pages27
JournalSolvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Funding

The authors are grateful to Cognis Corporation for the gift of a sample of LIX 79 and for information on the identity of the guanidine active ingredient. This research was sponsored by the Environmental Management Science Program of the Offices of Science and Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC.

FundersFunder number
UT-Battelle
U.S. Department of EnergyDE-AC05-00OR22725
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Alternatives to nitric acid stripping in the caustic-side solvent extraction (CSSX) process for cesium removal from alkaline high-level waste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this