TY - GEN
T1 - Adiabatic Quantum Support Vector Machines
AU - Woun, Dong Jun
AU - Date, Prasanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Machine learning's ability to analyze and predict complex data enables many scientific discoveries and industrial advances. However, state-of-the-art machine learning requires extensive computational resources for training. In machine learning, the training phase is crucial because it enables the model to acquire knowledge from the provided data. The duration of the training process varies significantly, ranging from a few hours to several months. As a result, the computational cost and time constraints hinder researchers from using machine learning. To address this issue, we investigated the possibility of using quantum computers for machine-learning tasks. We compared Date's [1] quantum support vector machine (SVM) approach on a D-Wave Advantage to a classical implementation on AMD Ryzen and Intel Xeon processors. We evaluated both the time-to-solution and the machine-learning performance of the quantum and classical systems. The results of our study demonstrated that SVMs scaled O(N2) on the quantum computer and O(N2d) on the classical computer. Here, N represents the number of samples, and d represents the number of features. So, when trained with a data set with eight million features, we found that the quantum annealer outperformed the classical computer by 3.5-4.5x. The quantum approach maintained a comparable accuracy to the classical approach as well. In conclusion, quantum computers offer a computational advantage over classical computers for machine learning.
AB - Machine learning's ability to analyze and predict complex data enables many scientific discoveries and industrial advances. However, state-of-the-art machine learning requires extensive computational resources for training. In machine learning, the training phase is crucial because it enables the model to acquire knowledge from the provided data. The duration of the training process varies significantly, ranging from a few hours to several months. As a result, the computational cost and time constraints hinder researchers from using machine learning. To address this issue, we investigated the possibility of using quantum computers for machine-learning tasks. We compared Date's [1] quantum support vector machine (SVM) approach on a D-Wave Advantage to a classical implementation on AMD Ryzen and Intel Xeon processors. We evaluated both the time-to-solution and the machine-learning performance of the quantum and classical systems. The results of our study demonstrated that SVMs scaled O(N2) on the quantum computer and O(N2d) on the classical computer. Here, N represents the number of samples, and d represents the number of features. So, when trained with a data set with eight million features, we found that the quantum annealer outperformed the classical computer by 3.5-4.5x. The quantum approach maintained a comparable accuracy to the classical approach as well. In conclusion, quantum computers offer a computational advantage over classical computers for machine learning.
KW - D-Wave quantum annealer
KW - quantum computers
KW - support vector machine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180012391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/QCE57702.2023.10250
DO - 10.1109/QCE57702.2023.10250
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85180012391
T3 - Proceedings - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE 2023
SP - 296
EP - 297
BT - Proceedings - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE 2023
A2 - Muller, Hausi
A2 - Alexev, Yuri
A2 - Delgado, Andrea
A2 - Byrd, Greg
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE 2023
Y2 - 17 September 2023 through 22 September 2023
ER -