A technology-specific methodology for evaluating the GHG mitigation potential of advanced improved cookstoves

Samuel Evans, John Field

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Though improved cookstove development has been driven primarily by the health benefits associated with reduced emissions, there is growing recognition of corresponding greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits. The goal of this study is to investigate the trade-off between stove cost and GHG emissions savings by performing a cost-benefit analysis along an improved cookstove technology gradient, evaluating the stove's ability to lower net GHG emissions associated with household cooking. Preliminary results suggest a near-constant abatement cost across the considered IC designs, with a low cost relative to other GHG abatement technologies. Sensitivity analysis around site-specific factors such as the fraction of nonrenewable biomass and biochar yield is also conducted and found to significantly impact the overall abatement cost of each design but not their ordinal ranking. This methodology has potential value for cookstove designers, disseminators, and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011
Pages3268-3273
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011 - Austin, TX, United States
Duration: Jun 5 2011Jun 10 2011

Publication series

Name12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011
Volume4

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityAustin, TX
Period06/5/1106/10/11

Keywords

  • Carbon abatement cost
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Gasifier cookstove
  • Global warming potential
  • Products of incomplete combustion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A technology-specific methodology for evaluating the GHG mitigation potential of advanced improved cookstoves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this