A Tale from the Trenches: Applying Metamorphic and Differential Testing to Bioinformatics Software

Metamorphic and differential testing have been proposed as best practices for testing software that is difficult to test, such as for programs in scientific domains. An assumption is that these approaches can be easily customized and applied to almost any domain. However, scientific software is often data-driven, and metamorphic relations may require significant domain knowledge to develop. In addition, tools are often written for ad-hoc experimentation by the scientists and often embed many assumptions about the importance and representation of different natural phenomena. In this paper, we present our experience applying both metamorphic and differential testing to a set of four computational biology tools that predict the growth of an organism. While our original goal was to evaluate these techniques to improve our system-level testing, we encountered multiple roadblocks along the way. Although we did find faults (some confirmed by developers), we also uncovered a set of challenges, including the considerable manual effort required for (a) defining domain-specific tests, (b) validating correctness, and (c) distinguishing between issues stemming from poor data and those arising from incorrect software.