TY - JOUR
T1 - A review on current status of alloys 617 and 230 for gen IV nuclear reactor internals and heat exchangers
AU - Ren, Weiju
AU - Swindeman, Robert
PY - 2009/8
Y1 - 2009/8
N2 - Alloys 617 and 230 are currently identified as two leading candidate metallic materials in the down selection for applications at temperatures above 760°C in the Gen IV nuclear reactor systems. Qualifying the materials requires significant information related to codification, mechanical behavior modeling, metallurgical stability, environmental resistance, and many other aspects. In the present paper, material requirements for the Gen IV nuclear reactor systems are discussed; available information regarding the two alloys for the intended applications are reviewed and analyzed; and further R&D activities are suggested. In the United States the major requirement for qualifying the materials is to satisfy the ASME Subsection NH, with adequate considerations for NRC, ASME NQA-1, and Section XI. In comparison, Alloy 617 is more studied with larger existing databases in air and helium, while Alloy 230 may have highly desired potentials but needs more exploration. To provide a sound technical basis for the material selection decision, more data should be generated to characterize behaviors of both alloys in creep, loading rate sensitivity, fatigue, creep-fatigue, crack resistance, toughness, product form dependency, and metallurgical stability.
AB - Alloys 617 and 230 are currently identified as two leading candidate metallic materials in the down selection for applications at temperatures above 760°C in the Gen IV nuclear reactor systems. Qualifying the materials requires significant information related to codification, mechanical behavior modeling, metallurgical stability, environmental resistance, and many other aspects. In the present paper, material requirements for the Gen IV nuclear reactor systems are discussed; available information regarding the two alloys for the intended applications are reviewed and analyzed; and further R&D activities are suggested. In the United States the major requirement for qualifying the materials is to satisfy the ASME Subsection NH, with adequate considerations for NRC, ASME NQA-1, and Section XI. In comparison, Alloy 617 is more studied with larger existing databases in air and helium, while Alloy 230 may have highly desired potentials but needs more exploration. To provide a sound technical basis for the material selection decision, more data should be generated to characterize behaviors of both alloys in creep, loading rate sensitivity, fatigue, creep-fatigue, crack resistance, toughness, product form dependency, and metallurgical stability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955256743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.3121522
DO - 10.1115/1.3121522
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77955256743
SN - 0094-9930
VL - 131
JO - Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME
IS - 4
M1 - 044002
ER -