A master curve analysis of F82H using statistical and constraint loss size adjustments of small specimen data

  • G. R. Odette
  • , T. Yamamoto
  • , H. Kishimoto
  • , M. Sokolov
  • , P. Spätig
  • , W. J. Yang
  • , J. W. Rensman
  • , G. E. Lucas

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

    56 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    We assembled a fracture toughness database for the IEA heat of F82H based on a variety of specimen sizes with a nominal ASTM E1921 master curve (MC) reference temperature T0=-119 ± 3 °C. However, the data are not well represented by a MC. T0 decreases systematically with a decreasing deformation limit Mlim starting at ≈200, which is much higher than the E1921 censoring limit of 30, indicating large constraint loss in small specimens. The small scale yielding T0 at high Mlim is ≈98±5 °C. While, the scatter was somewhat larger than predicted, after model-based adjustments for the effects of constraint loss, the data are in reasonably good agreement with a MC with T0 = -98 °C. This supports to use of MC methods to characterize irradiation embrittlement, as long as both constraint loss and statistical size effects are properly accounted for. Finally, we note various issues, including sources of the possible excess scatter, which remain to be fully assessed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1243-1247
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Nuclear Materials
    Volume329-333
    Issue number1-3 PART B
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2004
    EventProceedings of the 11th Conference on Fusion Research - Kyoto, Japan
    Duration: Dec 7 2003Dec 12 2003

    Funding

    This research was supported by the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Science (Grant # DE-FG03-94ER54275). The authors also explicitly acknowledge the large IEA F82H database developed by Dr. K. Wallin of VTT Laboratory in Finland.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A master curve analysis of F82H using statistical and constraint loss size adjustments of small specimen data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this