A comparison of hybridization efficiency between flat glass and channel glass solid supports

Gabriel Betanzos-Cabrera, Brent W. Harker, Mitchel J. Doktycz, James L. Weber, Kenneth L. Beattie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Two different solid supports, channel glass and flat glass, were compared for their affect on the sensitivity and efficiency of DNA hybridization reactions. Both solid supports were tested using a set of arrayed, synthetic oligonucleotides that are designed to detect short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (SIDPs). A total of 13 different human SIDPs were chosen for analysis. Capture probes, designed for this test set, were covalently immobilized on substrates. Hybridization efficiency was assessed using fluorescently labeled stacking probes which were preannealed to the target and then hybridized to the support-bound oligonucleotide array; the hybridization pattern was detected by fluorescence imaging. It was found that structural features of nucleic acid capture probes tethered to a solid support and the molecular basis of their interaction with targets in solution have direct implications on the hybridization process. Our results demonstrate that channel glass has a number of practical advantages over flat glass including higher sensitivity and a faster hybridization rate.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)71-80
    Number of pages10
    JournalMolecular Biotechnology
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2008

    Keywords

    • Capture probes
    • Channel glass
    • Flat glass
    • Hybridization
    • Oligonucleotide arrays
    • Sensitivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of hybridization efficiency between flat glass and channel glass solid supports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this