Abstract
We compare and contrast the governing equations and numerical predictions of two higher-order theories of extended single crystal plasticity, specifically, Gurtin type and micropolar models. The models are presented within a continuum thermodynamic setting, which facilitates identification of equivalent terms and the roles they play in the respective models. Finite element simulations of constrained thin films are used to elucidate the various scale-dependent strengthening mechanisms and their effect of material response. Our analysis shows that the two theories contain many analogous features and qualitatively predict the same trends in mechanical behavior, although they have substantially different points of departure. This is significant since the micropolar theory affords a simpler numerical implementation that is less computationally expensive and potentially more stable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 29-51 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | International Journal of Plasticity |
Volume | 57 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
JRM acknowledges the support of Los Alamos National Laboratory, operated by Los Alamos National Security LLC under DOE Contract DE-AC52-06NA25936. This work also benefited from the support of Sandia National Laboratories through the Enabling Predictive Simulation Research Institute (EPSRI), and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program. Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by the Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under DOE contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. DLM would like to acknowledge support of the Carter N. Paden, Jr. Distinguished Chair in Metals Processing, as well as NSF grant CMMI-1030103 on Methods for Atomistic Input into Initial Yield and Plastic Flow Criteria for Nanocrystalline Metals.
Keywords
- A. Geometrically necessary dislocations
- A. Gradient plasticity
- B. Crystal plasticity
- B. Microforce balance
- C. Finite elements