A census of fish passage facilities at US hydropower developments across the conterminous United States

Paul G. Matson, Bryan B. Bozeman, Chris R. DeRolph, Gbadebo A. Oladosu, Debjani Singh, Diandre Richie, Jesus Morales, Jessica Pica, Bryan Sojkowski, Bjorn A. Lake, Nicholas B. Anderson, Blane Bellerud, Simon Dionson, Shannon Ames, Maryalice Fischer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Hydropower provides reliable and secure electricity and contributes significantly to the flexibility and stability of the US electricity grid. Hydropower dams generally are aquatic barriers and hazards to migratory fish in rivers. Fish passage facilities mitigate risks from hydropower to migratory fish, but information on these facilities is incomplete for the conterminous United States (CONUS). Here, we present the first CONUS-scale dataset of fish passage facilities at US hydropower developments in over 30 years. The existence of fish passage facilities (presence or absence) was specified for 1909 hydropower features, 390 of which had at least one facility. Most features had a single passage facility that provided passage in only one direction, with downstream being more common than upstream passage. Bypasses and ladders accounted for 60 % of the fish passage facility types. While we documented 659 fish passage facilities across CONUS, facilities were most common in the New England, Pacific Northwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Great Lakes regions. In general, fish passage facilities were more common at features that were closer to the ocean, at lower elevations, and at shorter dams, but not related to installed electrical generation capacity. Hydrologic sub-basins containing salmonids also contained the largest number of hydropower features, but the proportion of features with passage was generally higher in sub-basins containing multiple migratory taxa. This census provides valuable information on existing fish passage mitigation and is a benchmark to gauge progress toward a modernized hydropower fleet that provides affordable, reliable energy while protecting fishery resources and river ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number126623
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume391
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO). Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The authors would like to thank the many people and organizations that shared information on fish passage facilities with us as well as the people that help us connect with them.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A census of fish passage facilities at US hydropower developments across the conterminous United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this