Abstract
Soil moisture influences precipitation mainly through its impact on land–atmosphere interactions. Understanding and correctly modeling soil moisture–precipitation (SM–P) coupling is crucial for improving weather forecasting and subseasonal to seasonal climate predictions, especially when predicting the persistence and magnitude of drought. However, the sign and spatial structure of SM–P feedback are still being debated in the climate research community, mainly due to the difficulty in establishing causal relationships and the high degree of nonlinearity in land–atmosphere processes. To this end, we developed a causal inference model based on the Granger causality analysis and a nonlinear machine learning model. This model includes three steps: nonlinear anomaly decomposition, nonlinear Granger causality analysis, and evaluation of the quality of SM–P feedback, which eliminates the nonlinear response of interannual and seasonal variability and the memory effects of climatic factors and isolates the causal relationship of local SM–P feedback. We applied this model by using National Climate Assessment–Land Data Assimilation System (NCA-LDAS) datasets over the United States. The results highlight the importance of nonlinear atmosphere responses in land–atmosphere interactions. In addition, the strong feedback over the southwestern United States and the Great Plains both highlight the impacts of topographic factors rather than only the sensitivity of evapotranspiration to soil moisture. Furthermore, the SM–P index defined by our framework is used to benchmark Earth system models (ESMs), which provides a new metric for efficiently identifying potential model biases in modeling local land–atmosphere interactions and may help the development of ESMs in improving simulations of water cycle variability and extremes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1115-1131 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Hydrometeorology |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2020 |
Funding
Lu Li thanks Samuel Tuttle for his detailed explanation of their method. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant U1811464, 41975122, 41575072, and 41807181, the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant 2017YFA0604303, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Y. Deng is supported by the National Science Foundation Climate and Large-Scale Dynamics (CLD) program through Grant AGS-1445956. J. Mao is supported by the Reducing Uncertainty in Biogeochemical Interactions through Synthesis and Computation (BUBISCO) Scientific Focus Area (SFA) project funded through the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program in Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) of the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Program in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Acknowledgments. Lu Li thanks Samuel Tuttle for his detailed explanation of their method. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant U1811464, 41975122, 41575072, and 41807181, the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant 2017YFA0604303, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Y. Deng is supported by the National Science Foundation Climate and Large-Scale Dynamics (CLD) program through Grant AGS-1445956. J. Mao is supported by the Reducing Uncertainty in Biogeochemical Interactions through Synthesis and Computation (BUBISCO) Scientific Focus Area (SFA) project funded through the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program in Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) of the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Program in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.